Case Law β€Ί High Court β€Ί New v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Inc...

New v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 19 Aug 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court Β· hc_cis_mas
Parties
New v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
19 Aug 2024
Assessment year(s)
2013-2014
Outcome
Other

The order β€” as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In New v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Decision: This Writ Petition is disposed of with the above observations and directions.

Summary auto-generated from the order below β€” read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

W.P.No.24848 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 19.08.2024 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.No.24848 of 2021and W.M.P.Nos.26142 and 26143 of 2021 Vendhar Movies, New No.14, Old No.21,7[th] Main Road, R.A.Puram,Chennai – 600 028.PAN: ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1(3), Income Tax Department, Investigation Wing, Room No.312, 3[rd] Floor, New No.46, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai – 600 034. 2.The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-1, Income Tax Department, 108, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai – 600 034. ... Respondents Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the Writ Petitioner/Assessee on the file of the first respondent to quash the impugned order dated 19.09.2021 passed under Section 147 read with Section 144 of the Act for the Assessment Year 2013-2014 in DIN No.ITBA/AST/M/147/2021-2022/1035713883(1) for want of jurisdiction. For Petitioner : Mr.A.S.Sriraman For Respondents : Mr.A.N.R.Jayaprathap Junior Standing Counsel ORDER This writ petition is of the year 2021. 2. The petitioner is before this Court and aggrieved by the impugned order dated 19.09.2021 passed by the first respondent for the Assessment Year 2013-2014. 3. By the impugned order, the assessment has been completed by the first respondent. Operative portion of the impugned order reads as under:- β€œ3.2 A show cause notice dated 13.09.2021 was issued, in this regard, inviting the assessee's objections on or before 17.09.2021. However, the assessee has not responded to this show cause notice. In the circumstances, it is concluded that the assessee has no objection to assessing the amount of Rs.27,15,48,014/- as 'business income'. Accordingly, the amount of Rs.27,15,48,014/- is added to the total income of the assessee as 'business income'. (+) Rs.27,15,48,014/- 4. Disallowance u/s 40A(3) of the I.T.Act, 1961: 4.1 It was observed from the ledger extract (enclosed to this order as Annexure-3) that the assessee has paid an amount of Rs.7,35,00,000/- in cash to Shri.S.R.Prabhu, who is the proprietor W.P.No.24848 of 2021 of M/s.Dream Warrior Pictures towards 'theatrical rights' purchase. This payment in cash attracts application of Section 40A(3) of the I.T.Act, 1961. Hence, the assessee was given a show cause notice dated 13.09.2021 inviting its objections, for application of Section 40A(3) on the payment of Rs.7,35,00,000/-, on or before 17.09.2021. However, the assessee has not responded to this show cause notice. In the circumstances, it is concluded that the assessee has no objection to assessing the amount of Rs.7,35,00,000/- under Section 40A(3) of the I.T.Act, 1961. Accordingly, the amount of Rs.7,35,00,000/- is added to the total income of the assessee under Section 40A(3) of the I.T.Act, 1961. (+) Rs.7,35,00,000/- Based on the above, the assessment is completed as under:Income determined u/s.143(3) r.w.s.153A : Rs. 63,86,293/-Add : Disallowance as discussed in para 3 : Rs.27,15,48,014/- Disallowance as discussed in para 4 : Rs. 7,35,00,000/- ---------------------------Total Income : Rs.35,14,34,307/- --------------------------- The demand notice and tax computation sheet annexed to the order. Penalty proceedings u/s.271(1)(c) is initiated separately.” 4. The petitioner has challenged the impugned order on the ground that it has been passed in gross violation of principles of natural justice and that despite request for adjournment, the impugned order has been passed by the first respondent. 5. This writ petition is opposed by the respondents on the ground that the petitioner has an alternate remedy before the Appellate Commissioner under Section 246A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and therefore this writ petition is https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis3/7 The demand notice and tax computation sheet annexed to the order. Penalty proceedings u/s.271(1)(c) is initiated separately.” 4. The petitioner has challenged the impugned order on the ground that it has been passed in gross violation of principles of natural justice and that despite request for adjournment, the impugned order has been passed by the first respondent. 5. This writ petition is opposed by the respondents on the ground that the petitioner has an alternate remedy before the Appellate Commissioner under Section 246A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and therefore this writ petition is https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis3/7 W.P.No.24848 of 2021 liable to be dismissed. 6. I have considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Junior Standing Counsel for the respondents. 7. A reading of the impugned order indicates that the petitioner's request for adjournment was not considered and thus the impugned order has been passed by the first respondent. 8. The impugned order has been passed by the first respondent during the time when the country was under intermittent lockdown due to outbreak of Covid-19 pandemic. Therefore, neither the petitioner nor the respondents can be found fault with. 9. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case and to balance the interest of the parties, I am inclined to set aside the impugned order dated 19.09.2021 and remit the case back to the respondents to pass orders on merits, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. W.P.No.24848 of 2021 10. The petitioner shall file a detail reply to the impugned order, which stands quashed, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 11. The impugned order which stands quashed shall be treated as addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 13.09.2021 issued to the petitioner, which preceded the impugned order. 12. This Writ Petition is disposed of with the above observations and directions. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. Index : Yes/NoInternet : Yes/NoSpeaking Order/Non-Speaking OrderNeutral Citation : Yes/No 19.08.2024 arb To 1.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1(3), Income Tax Department, Investigation Wing, Room No.312, 3[rd] Floor, New No.46, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai – 600 034. 2.The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-1, Income Tax Department, 108, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai – 600 034. W.P.No.24848 of 2021 C.SARAVANAN, J. arb W.P.No.24848 of 2021 W.P.No.24848 of 2021andW.M.P.Nos.26142 and 26143 of 2021 and 19.08.2024 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
βœ… Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice β†’ πŸ’¬ Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only β€” not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press Β· Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
Β© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP Β· LLPIN ACN-4920 Β· Jaipur, Rajasthan