N.geetha v. The Special Commissioner & Commissioner Of Agricultural Income Tax, Chepauk, Chennai β 5
High Court
25 Feb 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court Β· hc_cis_mas
Parties
N.geetha v. The Special Commissioner & Commissioner Of Agricultural Income Tax, Chepauk, Chennai β 5
Date of order
25 Feb 2010
Assessment year(s)
β
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In N.geetha v. The Special Commissioner & Commissioner Of Agricultural Income Tax, Chepauk, Chennai β 5, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below β read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order β as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 25.02.2010
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR
W.P.NO.39101 of 2006 (T)(O.A.No.7851 of 1999)
N.Geetha
.. Petitioner Vs.
1.The Special Commissioner & Commissioner of Agricultural Income Tax, Chepauk, Chennai β 5.
2.The Principal Commissioner and Commissioner of Land Reforms, Chepauk, Chennai β 5... Respondents
PRAYER: Original Application No.7851 of 1999 was filed before theTamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, praying to call for the recordson the file of the respondents 1 and 2 in connection with the orderpassed by them in their proceedings B1/3008/99 dated 2.8.1999 by thesecond respondent and B1/3008/99 dated 26.8.1999 and B1/3008/99 dated3.12.1999 by the first respondent and quash the same. Since theTamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. wasreceived by transfer and numbered as Writ Petition.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Singaravelan For Respondents : Mr.S.Shivashnamugam, Government Advocate
Original Application No.7851 of 1999 was filed before theTamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, praying to call for the recordson the file of the respondents 1 and 2 in connection with the orderpassed by them in their proceedings B1/3008/99 dated 2.8.1999 by thesecond respondent and B1/3008/99 dated 26.8.1999 and B1/3008/99 dated3.12.1999 by the first respondent and quash the same. Since theTamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. wasreceived by transfer and numbered as Writ Petition.
2.The petitioner seeks benefits based on the tribunal orderpassed in T.A.No.69 of 1992 (W.P.No.6892/1986) dated 30.9.1992 and
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
R.A.No.142 of 1992 in T.A.No.69 of 1992 dated 4.4.1994. The learnedcounsel for the petitioner states that a representation will be madein this regard and a direction may be issued to consider the same.
3.In view of the above, the petitioner is given liberty tomake a representation as above and such representation shall beconsidered and disposed of on merits, within three months from thedate of receipt of such representation. This writ petition standsdisposed of accordingly. No costs.
Sd/-Asst. Registrar//true copy//Sub Asst.RegistrarvsmTo1.The Special Commissioner & Commissioner of Agricultural Income Tax, Chepauk, Chennai β 5.2.The Principal Commissioner and Commissioner of Land Reforms, Chepauk, Chennai β 5.1 cc to Mr.R.Singgaravelan, Advocate, Sr.No.130271 cc to Government Pleader, Sr.No.13444W.P.No.39101 of 2006(T)GR {CO}TP/17.3.2010.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only β not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CAβclient relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.