Nikunj Malik, Faridabad v. Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridabad
High Court
20 Apr 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Nikunj Malik, Faridabad v. Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridabad
Date of order
20 Apr 2021
Assessment year(s)
2014-15
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nikunj Malik, Faridabad v. Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridabad, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
11/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA,
Al CHANDIGARH
ITA-1-2021 (O&M)Date of decision : 20.04.2021
Nikunj Malik, Faridabad
Versus
Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax, Faridabad
... Appellant
.. Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH.HON'BLE MR.JIUSTICK SANT PARKASHHON'BLE MR.JIUSTICK SANT PARKASH
Present °Mr. Karanveer Jindal, Advocatefor the petitioner.
3The aforesaid presence 1s being recorded through video-conferencingsince the proceedings are being conducted in virtual court4
Jaswant Singh,J. (Oral)
CM No.854CII of 2021
For the reasons mentioned therein, CM is allowed and delay of
172 days in refiling the present appeal is condoned,IT a2027
The appellant-assessee has filed the instant appeal under Section260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 assailing the order dated 08.04.2019 passedby the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, whereby the appealof the assessee directed against the order dated 28.11.2017 passed by CIT (A)Faridabad for the assessment year 2014-15 challenging the addition ofRs.44,05,000/- on account of investment in purchase of property, has beendismissed|
During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the appellantprays for permission to withdraw the present appeal as his client has alreadyapproached the appropriate authority under the “Amnesty Scheme”,
Dismissed as withdrawn.
|JASWANT SINGH4JUDGE
20.04.7202|SANT PARKA SH4sdJUDGESUDHIR KUMAR2021.04.20 14:41Whether speaking/reasonedYes/NoI attest to the accuracy andauthenticity of this documentWhether ReportableYes/NoHigh Court, Chandigarh
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.