Nimit Builders Private Limited v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax 4 Respondentthrough

\. ^ \ •^V $-37, 40-42, 45, 51, 53-58 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +W.P.(C) 2584/2021 NIMIT BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED Petitioner Through: Ms. Kavita Jha, Advocate withMr. Vaibhav Kulkami and Mr. AnantMann, Advocates. versus O PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 4 RespondentThrough W.P.(C) 2976/2021ADITYA SARAF Petitioner Thi-ough: Mr. Rohit Jain, Advocate withMr. Aniket D. Agrawal and Ms.Manisha Sharma, Advocates. versus r^ + PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 4 & ANR. Respondents Through W.P.(C) 3004/2021 RAMESH CHANDRA SARAF Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohit Jain, Advocate withMr. Aniket D. Agrawal and Ms.Manisha Sharma, Advocates. versus PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 4 & ANR. Digitally Signed By:AMULYACertify that the digital file andphysical file have been compared thedigital data is as per the physical file O^ } Respondents Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate. +W.P.(C) 3006/2021 ASHISH SARAF Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohit Jain, Advocate with Mr. Aniket D. Agrawal andMs. Manisha Sharma, Advocates versus PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 4 & ANR. Respondents Through + W.P.(C) 3351/2021 fflGH VALUE TRADERS PVT LTD PetitionerThrough: Mr. Rohit Jain, Advocate withMr. Aniket D. Agrawal andMs. Manisha Sharma, Advocates versus PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 4 & ANR. Respondents Through + W.P.(C) 4032/2021 NARAYAN COMMODITY BROKERS PRIVATE LIMITED Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohit Jain, Advocate withMr. Aniket D. Agrawal and Ms.Manisha Sharma, Advocates. c c V versus PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 4 & ANR. Respondent Through + W.P.(C) 4219/2021 M/SNATRAJ PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED Petitioner Through. Mr. Amol Sinha, Advocate withMr. Ashvini Kumar, Advocate versus PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-4 & ANR. Respondent Through + W.P.(C) 4221/2021 M/S NATRAJ PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED PRIVATE LIMITED LIMITED PetitionerThrough: Mi*. Amol Sinha, Advocate withMr. Ashvini Kumar, Advocate versus PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-4 & ANR. Respondents Through +W.P.(C) 4224/2021 M/S SKY BLUE INFOTECH PVT. LTD. Petitioner Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, Advocate with o C >' Ml". Ashvini Kumar, Advocate versus PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DBLHI-7 & ANR. Respondents Through + W.P.(C) 4225/2021 M/S KARAMYOGI TRADING PRIVATE LIMITED TRADING PRIVATE LIMITED PRIVATE LIMITED LIMITED PetitionerThrough: Mr. Amol Sinha, Advocate withMr. Ashvini Kumar, Advocate versus PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-4 & ANR. Respondents Through + W.P.(C) 4227/2021 M/S NAMAH SHIVAYA TRADING PVT. LTD SHIVAYA TRADING PVT. LTD TRADING PVT. LTD PVT. LTD LTD PetitionerThrough: Mr. Amol Sinha, Advocate withMr. Ashvini Kumar, Advocate versus PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-4 & ANR.Respondents Through +W.P.(C) 4256/2021 M/S NAMAH SHIVAYA TRADING PVT. LTD. Petitioner Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, Advocate withMr. Ashvini Kumar, Advocate. / c \y versus PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-4 & ANR. Respondent Through CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHANHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAORDER25.08.2021 % The petitions have been heard by way of video conferencing.Learned counsel for the petitioners state that the present writ petitionsare infiuctuous, inasmuch as, revised Form-3 have been issued to thepetitioners in accordance with the prayer clauses. Consequently, the present writ petitions are disposed of as satisfied.The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order bealso forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail. manMohan, j —— NAVIN CHAWLA, J AUGUST 25, 2021TS