Case Law › High Court › Ninad Sharma v. State Of Rajasthan Throu...

Ninad Sharma v. State Of Rajasthan Through Pp

High Court 30 Jan 2017 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · jaipur

Parties

Date of order

30 Jan 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Ninad Sharma v. State Of Rajasthan Through Pp, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHANBENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO. 1678/2014(D) Ninad Sharma S/o Shri Nand Lal Sharma, aged about 35 years, R/oL-54 Income Tax Colony, Tonk Road, Durgapur, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan Through PP 2. Director General of Police, Jaipur. 3. Assistant Commissioner of Police, Jaipur (South) 4. S.H.O., P.S. Banipark, District Jaipur. 5. Investigation Officer in the F.I.R. bearing No.52/2013 registered at P.S. Banipark, jaipur District jaipur (Rajasthan). 6. Vinita Sharma W/o Shri Ninad Sharma D/o Shri Vijay Kumar Sharma, R/o 14-A, RSEB Colony, D Block Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Respondents HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Order 30/1/2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he maybe permitted to withdraw the petition to enable the petitioner totakeup all the pleas available to him before the trial court. Ordered accordingly. (SABINA)J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.