Nipha Enterprises Llp v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-32 And Ors
High Court
29 Sep 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Nipha Enterprises Llp v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-32 And Ors
Date of order
29 Sep 2022
Assessment year(s)
2015-16
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nipha Enterprises Llp v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-32 And Ors, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: NiphaEnterprises for the assessment year 2015-16 being annexure P-2 to the writ petition at page 58 as also by letter dated 26[th] July, 2021 which appears atpage 61 being annexure P-4 to the writ petition and petitioner submits thatin view of this admitted fact substantiated by record, the aforesai...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
OD –3
ORDER SHEET
WPO/2676/2022IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTACONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTIONORIGINAL SIDE
NIPHA ENTERPRISES LLP
VSASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-32 AND ORS
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE MD. NIZAMUDDIN
Date: 29[th] September, 2022.
Appearance:Mr. J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv.Ms. Swapna Das, Adv.Mr. Siddharth Das, Adv.…For the Petitioner
Mr. Om Narayan Rai, Adv.…For the Respondents
The Court: Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
Affidavit of service filed in Court be kept with the records.
By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugned orderdated 27[th] July, 2022 and notice dated 28[th] July, 2022 relating toassessment year 2017-18, under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961which has been issued in the name of M/s. Nipha Enterprises, apartnership firm which according to the petitioner is, non-existing entitysince it has already been converted as LLP (Nipha Enterpsies LLP) whichidentification No. AAC-9999 under the LLP Act, 2008, with effect from 2[nd]December, 2014 and this fact of conversion was already intimated to therespondent Income Tax Authority as appears from the assessment orderdated 13[th] November, 2017 passed in the case of the firm M/s. NiphaEnterprises for the assessment year 2015-16 being annexure P-2 to the writ
petition at page 58 as also by letter dated 26[th] July, 2021 which appears atpage 61 being annexure P-4 to the writ petition and petitioner submits thatin view of this admitted fact substantiated by record, the aforesaidimpugned order is not sustainable in law and is liable to be quashed.
Learned advocate appearing for the respondent Income Tax Authorityis not in a position to contradict the aforesaid allegation and the submissionof the petitioner which is supported by records.
Considering the submissions of the parties, this writ petition beingWPO 2676 of 2022 is disposed of by quashing the impugned order dated27[th] July, 2022 being annexure P-10 to the writ petition and the impugnednotice dated 28[th] July, 2022 being annexure P-11 to the writ petition.
However, dismissal of this writ petition will not prevent the IncomeTax Authority concerned to issue any fresh notice, in the matter inaccordance with law.
With these observations and directions, this writ petition standsdisposed of.
TR/
(MD. NIZAMUDDIN, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.