Case Law › High Court › Nirmal Takhat Baba Budha Sahib Charitabl...

Nirmal Takhat Baba Budha Sahib Charitable Trust ._..... Petitione v. Designated Authority, Office Of Income Tax Officer And Others

High Court 02 Nov 2021 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

02 Nov 2021

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nirmal Takhat Baba Budha Sahib Charitable Trust ._..... Petitione v. Designated Authority, Office Of Income Tax Officer And Others, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH CW P-22370-2021Date of decision: 02.11.2021 Nirmal Takhat Baba Budha Sahib Charitable Trust ._..... Petitione Versus Designated Authority, Office of Income Tax Officer and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICK PANKAJ JAIN Present:Mr. Monty Goyal, Advocatefor the petitioner. (Through Video Conferencing) FS AE FS AJAY TEWARI, J (QRAL) This writ petition under Article 226/227 has been filedpraying for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing therespondents to decide the appeal (Annexure P-2) filed by the petitioner-Trust before respondent No.2 and grant two months' time to pay theamount as per Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, 2 After arguing for some time, learned counsel for thepetitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to filefresh one with better particulars, 3]Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. (AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE (PANKAJ JAIN)JUDGE02.11.2021DineshWhether speaking/reasonedYes/No.Whether ReportableYes/No

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.