Case LawHigh Court › Nirmala Sankaran v. Income Tax Officer

Nirmala Sankaran v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 07 Mar 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Nirmala Sankaran v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
07 Mar 2023
Assessment year(s)
2018-19
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nirmala Sankaran v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In light of the endorsement made by Ms.Ashwini Vaidialingam, learned counsel on record for the petitioner to the effect that the petitioner does not wish to pursue this Writ Petition, the same is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
W.P.No.7214 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 07.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH W.P.No.7214 of 2023and WMP.Nos.7266, 7267, 7268 & 7269 of 2023 Nirmala Sankaran Vs 1.Income Tax Officer Corp. Ward 6(1), Wanaparthy Block, No.121, MG Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034 ... Petitioner 2.HDFC Bank No.2, PS Sivasamy Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004. ... RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus', calling for the records contained in order dated 31.01.2021 passed by the 1st Respondent bearing ITBA/RCV/F/17/2022-23/1049298630(1) for PAN: for AY 2018-19 and to quash the same as illegal, unjust and arbitrary, and consequently direct the 1st Respondent to forbear from taking any steps towards the recovery of the demand raised for PAN: for AY 2018-19, pending disposal of the Petitioner's appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and to further direct the 1st Respondent to lift any attachment made on the bank accounts maintained by the Petitioner with the 2nd Respondent. For Petitioner : Ms.Ashwini Vaidialingam O R D E R Dr.ANITA SUMANTH,J. In light of the endorsement made by Ms.Ashwini Vaidialingam, learned counsel on record for the petitioner to the effect that the petitioner does not wish to pursue this Writ Petition, the same is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Connected Miscellaneous Petitions are also dismissed. 07.03.2023 vsIndex : Yes / NoSpeaking Order Neutral citation:Yes/No ToThe Income Tax OfficerCorp. Ward 6(1),Wanaparthy Block, No.121,MG Road, NungambakkamChennai-600 034 W.P.No.7214 of 2023and WMP.Nos.7266, 7267, 7268 & 7269 of 2023
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan