Case Law › High Court › Nisha Jain v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1...

Nisha Jain v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), Aayakar Bhawan, Christianbasti, G.s. Road, Guwahati

High Court 23 Aug 2023 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · jaipur

Parties

Date of order

23 Aug 2023

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nisha Jain v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), Aayakar Bhawan, Christianbasti, G.s. Road, Guwahati, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 2.Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed for.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4282/2022 Nisha Jain W/o Shri Pritesh Jain, Aged About 38 Years, 177,Gayatri Nagar B, Maharani Farm, Durgapura, Jaipur 302018 ----Petitioner Versus 1. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), Aayakar Bhawan, ChristianBasti, G.S. Road, Guwahati 781005Basti, G.S. Road, Guwahati 781005 2. Additional Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Range 06, NewC.R. Building, Statue Circle, Bhagwan Dass Road, Jaipur.----RespondentsC.R. Building, Statue Circle, Bhagwan Dass Road, Jaipur.----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dileep ShivpuriFor Respondent(s): Mr. Sandeep Pathak HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN 23/08/2023 Order 1.Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of thepresent writ petition as the same has been rendered infructuous. 2.Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed for. 3.Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J(AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH),CJ KAMLESH KUMAR/RAJAT/54-D

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.