Case Law › High Court › Nisha Jain v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1...

Nisha Jain v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), Aayakar Bhawan, Christianbasti, G.s. Road, Guwahati

High Court 11 Aug 2023 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · jaipur

Parties

Date of order

11 Aug 2023

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Nisha Jain v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), Aayakar Bhawan, Christianbasti, G.s. Road, Guwahati, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4264/2022 Nisha Jain W/o Shri Pritesh Jain, Aged About 38 Years, 177,Gayatri Nagar B, Maharani Farm, Durgapura, Jaipur 302018 ----Petitioner Versus 1. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), Aayakar Bhawan, ChristianBasti, G.S. Road, Guwahati 781005Basti, G.S. Road, Guwahati 781005 2. Additional Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Range 06, NewC.R. Building, Statue Circle, Bhagwan Dass Road, Jaipur.C.R. Building, Statue Circle, Bhagwan Dass Road, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, Advocate for Mr. Dileep Shivpuri, Advocate HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 11/08/2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by efflux oftime, the present petition has been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, this petition is disposed off as having renderedinfructuous. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),J Karan/49

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.