Nismuk Investments & Trading Pvt.ltd v. C.m.jha, Dy. Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Special Range 15, Bombay & Ors
High Court
15 Jun 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nismuk Investments & Trading Pvt.ltd v. C.m.jha, Dy. Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Special Range 15, Bombay & Ors
Date of order
15 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nismuk Investments & Trading Pvt.ltd v. C.m.jha, Dy. Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Special Range 15, Bombay & Ors, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1519 of 1993
Nismuk Investments & Trading Pvt.Ltd.
...Petitioners
vs.
C.M.Jha, Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax,Special Range 15, Bombay & Ors....Respondents
Mr. Rajesh Poojari, Advocate, i/b. Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt & Caroe, Advocates for the petitioners.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ.
DATED : 15TH JUNE, 2009
P.C.
1.On behalf of the petitioners, the learned Counsel submits that
he has no instructions. The Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Interim relief granted shall stand vacated.
(J.H. BHATIA,J.)
(F.I. REBELLO,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.