Nitesh Kumar Goyal v. For
High Court
05 Mar 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Nitesh Kumar Goyal v. For
Date of order
05 Mar 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nitesh Kumar Goyal v. For, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitally signedby HEERA LALSAHUDate:2025.03.0517:00:42+0530
2025:CGHC:10718-DB
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCC No. 227 of 2025
Nitesh Kumar Goyal 212, Lal Ganga Shopping Mall, G.E. Road, Raipur, 492001 (Chhattisgarh).Nitesh Kumar Goyal 212, Lal Ganga Shopping Mall, G.E. Road, Raipur, 492001 (Chhattisgarh).
... Applicant
versus
Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle -1(1) Circle-1(1), Raipur, Aaykar Bhawan, Near Akashwani, Civil Lines, Raipur (C.G.)- 492001.Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle -1(1) Circle-1(1), Raipur, Aaykar Bhawan, Near Akashwani, Civil Lines, Raipur (C.G.)- 492001.
... Respondent
For Applicant
For Applicant: Mr. S. Rajeshwara Rao, Adv. and Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, Advocate. Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, Advocate.For Respondent: Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Advocate.
DB: Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalHon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
Order on Board(05.03.2025)
1. Heard on MCC No. 227/2025, which is an application for restoration of TAXC No. 14/2025 which was dismissed for want of prosecution.restoration of TAXC No. 14/2025 which was dismissed for want of prosecution.
2. Admit.
3. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and TAXC No. 14/2025 is directed to be restored to its original number subject to payment of the cost of Rs. 5,000/- to the High Court Legal Services Committee.allowed and TAXC No. 14/2025 is directed to be restored to its original number subject to payment of the cost of Rs. 5,000/- to the High Court Legal Services Committee.
Sd/-(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge
H.L. Sahu
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.