Case Law › High Court › Nitin Chauhan v. Principal Commissioner...

Nitin Chauhan v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla …

High Court 07 Jul 2021 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · cmis

Parties

Date of order

07 Jul 2021

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Nitin Chauhan v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla …, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: Whether approved for reporting?[1] No.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA ITA No. 4 of 2020 Decided on: 07.07.2021 Nitin Chauhan .......Petitioner Versus Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla …...Respondent Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?[1] No. For the petitioner: Mr. Vishal Mohan, Advocate.For the respondent: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, SeniorAdvocate with Ms. VandanaKuthiala, Advocate. (Through video conferencing) Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that thematter in issue stands decided, therefore, he is underinstructions not to press the present petition. His statement istaken on record. Consequently, the instant petition is dismissedas not pressed. ( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) Judge July 07, 2021 (naveen) ( Satyen Vaidya ) Judge 1Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.