Nitin Chordia Son Of Shri Vinay Chordia v. Assistant Director Of Income Tax (Investigation), Alwar
High Court
16 Jul 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Nitin Chordia Son Of Shri Vinay Chordia v. Assistant Director Of Income Tax (Investigation), Alwar
Date of order
16 Jul 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nitin Chordia Son Of Shri Vinay Chordia v. Assistant Director Of Income Tax (Investigation), Alwar, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5429/2021
1. Vinay Chordia Son Of Shri Labh Chand Chordia, AgedAbout 64 Years, R/o C-61, Sangram Colony, C-Scheme,Jaipur.About 64 Years, R/o C-61, Sangram Colony, C-Scheme,Jaipur.
2. Madhu Chordia Wife Of Shri Vinay Chordia, Aged About59 Years, R/o C-61, Sangram Colony, C-Scheme, Jaipur.59 Years, R/o C-61, Sangram Colony, C-Scheme, Jaipur.
3. Vivek Chordia Son Of Shri Vinay Chordia, Aged About 40Years, R/o C-61, Sangram Colony, C-Scheme, Jaipur.Years, R/o C-61, Sangram Colony, C-Scheme, Jaipur.
4. Nitin Chordia Son Of Shri Vinay Chordia, Aged About 36Years, R/o C-61, Sangram Colony, C-Scheme, Jaipur.Years, R/o C-61, Sangram Colony, C-Scheme, Jaipur.
----Petitioners
Versus
Assistant Director Of Income Tax (Investigation), Alwar, 22, MotiDoongri Road, Alwar.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
For Respondent(s)
: Mr. Saurav Harsh, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Siddharth Ranka, Adv.Mr. Siddharth Ranka, Adv.
: Mr. Nikhil Simlote, Adv. on behalf of Mr. R.B. Mathur, Adv.Mr. R.B. Mathur, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR GAUR
Order
16/07/2021
Matter comes up on an application for withdrawal of the writ
petition.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(ASHOK KUMAR GAUR),J
Ramesh Vaishnav /86/Monika 39
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.