Nitin Rasiklal Parekh (Huf v. Appearance

C/CA/2190/2020 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2190 of 2020In F/TAX APPEAL NO. 17624 of 2020With F/TAX APPEAL NO. 17624 of 2020 ==========================================================NITIN RASIKLAL PAREKH (HUF) VersusINCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(2)(4) ========================================================== Appearance: DARSHAN R PATEL(8486) for the Applicant(s) No. 1NOTICE NOT RECD BACK(3) for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALAandHONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA Date : 10/12/2020 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA) ORDER IN CIVIL APPLICATION Having heard the learned counsel for the applicant andhaving considered the averments made in the Civil Application,the delay is condoned. Civil Application stands disposed of. ORDER IN TAX APPEAL Mr.Darshan R.Patel, the learned counsel appearing for theappellant (assessee) submits that he may be permitted towithdraw this Tax Appeal as his client would like to avail thebenefit under the scheme of the Government called “the DirectTax (Vivad se Vishwas)”. He makes a further request that libertyto revive the Tax Appeal may be reserved. In view of the statement made by Mr.Patel, as referred toabove, this Tax Appeal is disposed of as not pressed to enablethe appellant to avail the benefit under the scheme “Vivad seVishwas” with a liberty to revive the Tax Appeal in case of anydifficulty. The Tax Appeal stands disposed of as not pressed. (J. B. PARDIWALA, J.) /MOINUDDIN (ILESH J. VORA, J.)