Case LawHigh Court › N.jegatheesan v. The Commissioner Of Inc...

N.jegatheesan v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Madurai

High Court 06 Aug 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · mdubench
Parties
N.jegatheesan v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Madurai
Date of order
06 Aug 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In N.jegatheesan v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Madurai, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.08.2019 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH W.P(MD)No.5564 of 2017and W.M.P(MD) Nos.4447 and 6689 of 2017 N.Jegatheesan... PetitionerVs. 1.The Commissioner ofIncome Tax (Appeals),Madurai. 2.The Income Tax Officer,Non-Corporate Ward-2(3),V.P.Rathinasamy Nadar Road,Madurai – 625 002.... Respondents PRYAER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamusto call for the records of the second respondent relating to theorder bearing No.PAN:ADWPJ 3312K/NCW2(3)/mdu dated 20.03.2017 and toquash the same with consequential direction to the second respondentto act in terms of order calling for remand report passed by thefirst respondent on 13.02.2017 vide ITA No. 0173/2014-2015 withinthe time stipulated by him. ORDER The petitioner challenges order dated 22.03.2017 directing theassessee/petitioner to remit 15% of the disputed demand uponcondition of which stay of collection of the remaining demand wouldbe considered by the respondent Officer. 2. It transpires that during the pendency of the writ petition,15% of the disputed demand has been realized on 04.03.2017 andthereafter on 24.03.2019, attachments were lifted and bank accountsreleased. This is clear from the synopsis of dates and events filedby the Standing Counsel for the Income Department dated 24.03.2017. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/3. In the above circumstances,, nothing survives as far as thiswrit petition is concerned. 4. However, the appeal filed by the petitioner before theCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in ITA No. 173/14-15 is statedto be pending since 2014 and learned Special Government Pleader doesnot dispute this position. Thus, a direction is issued to the firstrespondent to dispose ITA No.173/14-15 as expeditiously possible andin any event, within a period of six weeks from today. 5. In fine, this writ petition is disposed with no order as tocosts. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Crl. Side) /TRUE COPY/ To Sub Assistant Registrar 1.The Commissioner ofIncome Tax (Appeals),Madurai. 2.The Income Tax Officer,Non-Corporate Ward-2(3),V.P.Rathinasamy Nadar Road,Madurai – 625 002. +1 CC to M/s.BABU.RAJENDRAN, Advocate ( SR-79877[F] dated 06/08/2019)+1 CC to M/s.S.SRIMATHY, Advocate ( SR-80236[F] dated 07/08/2019 ) cmJM/17.09.2019/2P/5C W.P(MD)No.5564 of 2017 and W.M.P(MD) Nos.4447 and 6689 of 2017 06.08.2019
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan