Case LawHigh Court › Nma-462.2013 v. Nma-462.2013

Nma-462.2013 v. Nma-462.2013

High Court 17 Jul 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma-462.2013 v. Nma-462.2013
Date of order
17 Jul 2015
Assessment year(s)
1995-96
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma-462.2013 v. Nma-462.2013, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

sjs9-NMA-462.2013IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.462 OF 2013ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6834 OF 2010 Linklaters…. ApplicantIn the matter betweenLinklaters…. AppellantVs.The Income Tax Officer, InternationalTaxation, Ward 1(1)(2), Mumbai…. Respondent Mr. Naresh Thakker with Mr. Anay Banhatti andMs Shweta Rajan i/b Mr. Madhur Baya for theAppellant.Mr. Arind Pinto for the Respondent. CORAM: M.S. SANKLECHA & N.M. JAMDAR, JJ.DATE : 17 JULY 2015 P.C: 1.By this notice of motion, the applicant seeks interim relief restraining the respondent/revenue from, in any manner, giving effect to the order of the Tribunal, dated 16-7-2010, impugned in the above appeal. The impugned order is passed in respect of Assessment Year 1995-96. Page 1 of 3 2.This appeal has been admitted on 30-4-2014. This Court had by an order dated 6-1-2014 granted ad-interim relief against implementation and execution of the impugned order dated 16-7-2010. This was on the basis that the issues arising in this appeal prima facie stand concluded in favour of the appellant by the decision of the Special Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in the case of Clifford Chance v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax {318 ITR Page 237} which had occasion to also consider the scope of amendments made to Section 9 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in 2010 with retrospective effect from 1-6-1997. Further, nothing has been shown to us by the revenue of steps taken pursuant to order of the Special Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in the case of Clifford Chance (supra). Moreover, the revenue has not pointed out any distinguishing features which would make the decision of the Special Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in Clifford Chance (supra) inapplicable to the present facts. Page 2 of 3 sjs 3.In the above view, the ad-interim relief which was granted in terms of prayer clause (b) on 6-1-2014 is now confirmed into interim relief, pending the final disposal of the appeal. Notice of motion stands disposed of in the above terms. (N.M. JAMDAR, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.) Page 3 of 3
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan