Case LawHigh Court › Nma/1002/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/1002/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Vi, Mumbai v. M/S Navin Bharat Ind.ltd

High Court 25 Jul 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1002/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Vi, Mumbai v. M/S Navin Bharat Ind.ltd
Date of order
25 Jul 2006
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Nma/1002/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Vi, Mumbai v. M/S Navin Bharat Ind.ltd, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1002 OF 2003IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODGING) NO. 257 OF 2003 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... AppellantMumbai City - VI, Mumbai.V/s.M/s. Navin Bharat Ind. Ltd.... Respondent Mr. A.D. Kango for the appellant.Mr. P.C. Tripathi for the respondent. CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE &V.R. KINGAONKAR,JJ.DATED : 25th July, 2006 P.C. .Heard Mr. Kango in support of this motionwhich seeks the condonation of delay of 48 days infiling the appeal. Mr. Tripathi appearing for therespondent leaves it to the Court to pass appropriateorder.In the circumstances, we accept theexplanation given in the supporting affidavit andcondone the delay in filing the appeal. Motiongranted in terms of prayer clause (a). The appeal benumbered. Notify the appeal for admission on 8thAugust, 2006. [H.L. GOKHALE, J.] [V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan