In Nma/1004/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-11, Mumbai v. M/S. Rajashri Productions (P) Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1004 OF 2006ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.484 OF 2006
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1004 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.484 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Rajshri Productions P. Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.A.D.Kango with P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.
Mr.S.J.Mehta for respondent.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 1ST OCTOBER, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
There is a delay of 429 days in preferring
the appeal. The I.T.A.T. order was received on
20/9/2004. The C.I.T. approval was received on
17/1/2005. The appeal was filed on 23/3/2006. There is no explanation whatsoever for the delay between 17/1/2005 to 23/3/2006. Considering the cause shown,
the same would not amount to sufficient cause. Hence
Motion is dismissed.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.