Case LawHigh Court › Nma/1004/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/1004/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-11, Mumbai v. M/S. Rajashri Productions (P) Ltd

High Court 01 Oct 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1004/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-11, Mumbai v. M/S. Rajashri Productions (P) Ltd
Date of order
01 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Nma/1004/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-11, Mumbai v. M/S. Rajashri Productions (P) Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1004 OF 2006ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.484 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1004 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.484 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Rajshri Productions P. Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.A.D.Kango with P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. Mr.S.J.Mehta for respondent. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 1ST OCTOBER, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- There is a delay of 429 days in preferring the appeal. The I.T.A.T. order was received on 20/9/2004. The C.I.T. approval was received on 17/1/2005. The appeal was filed on 23/3/2006. There is no explanation whatsoever for the delay between 17/1/2005 to 23/3/2006. Considering the cause shown, the same would not amount to sufficient cause. Hence Motion is dismissed. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan