Nma/101/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-5, Mumbai v. Lalit Sheth
High Court
26 Sep 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/101/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-5, Mumbai v. Lalit Sheth
Date of order
26 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/101/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-5, Mumbai v. Lalit Sheth, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.101 OF 2006IN
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.101 OF 2006
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.101 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1571 OF 2005
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1571 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
Lalit Sheth ..Respondent.
Mr.Ashokan for appellant.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 26TH SEPTEMBER, 2007.
DATED : 26TH SEPTEMBER, 2007.
P.C. :-
. The learned counsel on the last occasion had
had taken time to file better affidavit. The learned
counsel states that considering the record, it is not
possible to file a better affidavit.
2. The order of the I.T.A.T. was received on
13/3/2004. The file was sent to the Ministry of Law
immediately after 22/6/2004. There is no date when the
draft appeal memo was received. The appeal was filed
on 18/11/2005. There is no explanation for the delay
whatsoever between 22/6/2004 to 18/11/2005.
Considering the above, the cause shown would not amount
to sufficient cause. Hence Motion is dismissed.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.