Case LawHigh Court › Nma/10/2004 Of Commissionr Of Income Tax...

Nma/10/2004 Of Commissionr Of Income Tax City-4, Mumbai v. M/S. Shree Ambeshwar Paper Mills Ltd

High Court 02 Jun 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/10/2004 Of Commissionr Of Income Tax City-4, Mumbai v. M/S. Shree Ambeshwar Paper Mills Ltd
Date of order
02 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Nma/10/2004 Of Commissionr Of Income Tax City-4, Mumbai v. M/S. Shree Ambeshwar Paper Mills Ltd, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In view thereof the appeal is allowed to bewithdrawn and dismissed as such.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.10 OF 2004WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.461 of 2002The Commissioner of Income TaxMumbai City 4, Mumbai.. AppellantV/sM/s Shree Ambeshwar Paper Mills Ltd..RespondentMr.R.Ashokan with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for AppellantNone present for the RespondentCORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNANAND A.P.BHANGALE,JJDATED: JUNE 2, 2008P.C.:-1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Appellant. Thelearned Advocate for the Appellant Mr.R.Ashokan seeksleave to withdraw the appeal as the issue raised in theabove appeal is already covered against the revenue. 2. In view thereof the appeal is allowed to bewithdrawn and dismissed as such. 3. Permissible court fees be refunded to the (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J) (A.P.BHANGALE,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan