Nma/1031/2016 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax 10 v. Iot Infrastructure And Energy Services Ltd
High Court
01 Apr 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1031/2016 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax 10 v. Iot Infrastructure And Energy Services Ltd
Date of order
01 Apr 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nma/1031/2016 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax 10 v. Iot Infrastructure And Energy Services Ltd, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1031 OF 2016( NMA (L) No. 937 of 2016 )
ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2223 OF 2013
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-10Mumbai
.. Applicant
In the matter between Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-10Mumbai .. Applicant
v/s.
IOT Infrastructure & Energy Services Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr. Suresh Kumar a/w Ms. Samiksha Kanani for the applicant Ms. Vasanti Patel for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & A.K. MENON, J.J.
DATED : 1[st] APRIL, 2016.
P.C.
1.This Notice of Motion has been taken out for recall of the order
dated 15[th] December, 2015 passed by this Court dismissing the Revenue's appeal for non-prosecution.
2.We find that on 15[th] December, 2015 this appeal was dismissed in the morning session. However, on that date itself in the afternoon Mr.
Arvind Pinto, learned Counsel for the Revenue sought restoration of the appeal. However, as the same was sought without giving notice to the other side and it was not represented before us, the appeal could not be restored on that date.
3.In the above view, the the present notice of motion is allowed after condoning the delay in taking out the Notice of Motion. Thus, appeal is restored to the file of this Court.
4.Accordingly, the Notice of Motion is allowed. No order as to costs.
(A.K. MENON, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.