Case LawHigh Court › Nma/1039/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/1039/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Mumbai v. M/S. Wyeth Lederle Ltd

High Court 29 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1039/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Mumbai v. M/S. Wyeth Lederle Ltd
Date of order
29 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/1039/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Mumbai v. M/S. Wyeth Lederle Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1039 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL(L)NO.2474 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income-Tax..Appellant Mumbai City-7 V/s. M/s.Wyeth Lederle Limited..Respondent (Formerly known as Cyanamid India Ltd.)Mumbai Mr.Avinash D. Kango & Mr.P.S.Sahadevan, Advocate,for Appellant R.S.MOHITE,JJ. DATE : 29TH JANUARY, 2008 P.C. .This is a Notice of Motion for condoning adelay of 426 days in filing of the main appeal. Onperusal of the affidavit in support, we find thatthe appeal was approved for filing by the CCIT-IVon 24[th] August, 2005. Thereafter, it was actuallyfiled on 23[rd] November, 2006. There are no datesgiven for the event which occurred between 24[th]August, 2005 and 23[rd] November, 2006 and the delaycaused already is not properly explained. In the circumstances, the cause shown is not sufficientcause and the Notice of Motion stands dismissed. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan