Case LawHigh Court › Nma/1044/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/1044/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central - 2 v. Vijay Grihnirman Pvt Ltd

High Court 25 Jan 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1044/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central - 2 v. Vijay Grihnirman Pvt Ltd
Date of order
25 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Nma/1044/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central - 2 v. Vijay Grihnirman Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1044 OF 2018 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 369 OF 2018 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1364 OF 2017 ALONG WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1045 OF 2018 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 357 OF 2018 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1367 OF 2017 ALONG WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1049 OF 2018 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 385 OF 2018 ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1366 OF 2017 ALONG WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1050 OF 2018 INNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 399 OF 2018IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1371 OF 2017 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2 In the matter between Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2 v/s. Vijay Grihnirman Pvt. Ltd. .. Applicant .. Appellant .. Respondent Mr. Suresh Kumar for the applicant / appellant None for the respondent CORAM : AKIL KURESHI & M.S. SANKLECHA, J.J. P.C. DATED : 25[th] JANUARY, 2019 1.These applications have been taken out to condone the delay of65 days in filing the present notices of motion and to extend time offour weeks granted by this Court in its order dated 21[st] June, 2018 toremove the office objections. The order dated 21[st] June, 2018 was self-operative order and it provided in case the office objections are notremoved within four weeks from 21[st] June, 2018, the appeal/s shallstands dismissed without further reference to the Court. 2.Having perused the affidavit in support of the notices of motionand having heard Mr. Suresh Kumar, who has made out a case in thepeculiar facts, for extending the time to remove the office objections asprovided in the order dated 21[st] June, 2018, we extend the time toremove the office objections upto 1[st] February, 2019. and having heard Mr. Suresh Kumar, who has made out a case in thepeculiar facts, for extending the time to remove the office objections asprovided in the order dated 21[st] June, 2018, we extend the time toremove the office objections upto 1[st] February, 2019. 3.Notices of Motion are allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b1). (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.) (AKIL KURESHI, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan