Case LawHigh Court › Nma/105/2018 Of Pr.commissioner Of Incom...

Nma/105/2018 Of Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax,Central-3 v. Ritesh Amritlal Jain

High Court 23 Feb 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/105/2018 Of Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax,Central-3 v. Ritesh Amritlal Jain
Date of order
23 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/105/2018 Of Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax,Central-3 v. Ritesh Amritlal Jain, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 5.As a consequence, the Appeal also stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 105 OF 2018ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO. 1227 OF 2015WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO. 1227 OF 2015 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax,Central-3, Mumbai .. Applicant In the matter betweenThe Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax,Central-3, Mumbai .. Appellant v/s. Ritesh Amritlal Jain .. Respondent Ms. Padma Divakar for the applicant / Orig. appellant Mr. Sameer Dalal for the respondent CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J.J. P.C. DATED : 23[rd] FEBRUARY, 2018. 1.This Notice of Motion seeks condonation of 632 days delay in taking out the application for setting aside the conditional order dated 14[th] January, 2016 passed by the Prothonotary and Senior Master under Rule 986 of the High Court, Original Side Rules. 2.Ms. Padma Divakar, learned Counsel appearing for the applicant 105-18-NMA-7=.doc states that the tax effect involved in the present appeal is only Rs. 16.50 lakhs as mentioned in paragraph no.2 of the affidavit in support of the motion dated 4[th] December, 2017 of Mr. Abhay Marathe, Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai. 3.In the above view, in view of the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) Circular No. 21 of 2015 dated 10[th] December, 2015, as the tax effect involved in the present appeal is less than the threshold limit of Rs.20 lakhs as provided in the aforesaid circular, she has been instructed to withdraw the present Notice of Motion seeking condonation of delay. 4.Accordingly, the notice of motion is dismissed as withdrawn. 5.As a consequence, the Appeal also stands dismissed. (RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan