Nma/106/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax 13, Mumbai v. Sterling Oil Resources Ltd
High Court
23 Mar 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/106/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax 13, Mumbai v. Sterling Oil Resources Ltd
Date of order
23 Mar 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nma/106/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax 13, Mumbai v. Sterling Oil Resources Ltd, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Needless to state that if the objections are not removed within the stipulated time, the appeal shall stands dismissed without further reference to the Court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 106 OF 2018IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2162 OF 2017
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-13Mumbai .. Applicant
In the matter betweenThe Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-13Mumbai .. Appellant v/s.
Sterling Oil Resources Ltd., Mumbai
.. Respondent
Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma for the applicant / orig. appellant Mr. F.A. Bhatt i/b Mint & Confreres for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA &
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J.
P.C.
DATED : 23[rd] MARCH, 2018.
1.This application seeks condonation of 175 days delay in filing the
accompanying appeal from the order dated 22[nd] June, 2016 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal).
2.The affidavit in support dated 13[th] December, 2017 of Mr. Sunil S. Deshpande, Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax points out that order dated 22[nd] June, 2016 was received on 9[th] November, 2016 by the appellant. Thereafter, due to shifting of office, the file relating to the
106-18-NMA-3=.doc
present appeal got mixed up with other files and was only found after strenuous search on 27[th] July, 2017. Immediately thereafter steps were taken and the appeal was filed on 31[st] August, 2017.
3.We are satisfied with the reasons mentioned in the affidavit for delay in filing the present appeal. Accordingly, the motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (A).
4.The appellant is directed to remove the office objections, if any, within a period of four weeks from today. Needless to state that if the objections are not removed within the stipulated time, the appeal shall stands dismissed without further reference to the Court.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.