Nma/1063/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 8 Mumbai v. M/S. Rashtriya Metal Industries Ltd
High Court
01 Apr 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1063/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 8 Mumbai v. M/S. Rashtriya Metal Industries Ltd
Date of order
01 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/1063/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 8 Mumbai v. M/S. Rashtriya Metal Industries Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Consequently, appeal is also dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1063 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.2310 OF 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax-8...Appellant.Vs.M/s. Rashtriya Mental Industries Ltd. ..Respondent.Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.
Ms.A. Vissanji with Mr. S.J. Mehta for theRespondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATE : 1st April, 2009.
PC :
1. This is a notice of motion for condoning 801 days
delay in filing the main appeal.
2. Perusal of the affidavit in support of the motionindicates that the file was sent to the panel counselfor drafting the appeal memo on 10.5.2006 but thedraft was finally obtained some time after 16.7.2008.A period of more than two years and two months for
drafting the appeal memo cannot be said to be
reasonable.
3,. In our view, therefore, the cause shown does notamount to sufficient cause and hence, notice of motion
is dismissed. Consequently, appeal is also dismissed.
( R.S. MOHITE, J.)
( F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue