Case LawHigh Court › Nma/1066/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/1066/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 8 Mumbai v. M/S. Vivilon Textile Industires Pvt Ltd

High Court 01 Apr 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1066/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 8 Mumbai v. M/S. Vivilon Textile Industires Pvt Ltd
Date of order
01 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/1066/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 8 Mumbai v. M/S. Vivilon Textile Industires Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Consequently, appeal is also dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1066 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1898 OF 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax-8...Appellant.Vs.M/s. Vivilon Textile Industries Pvt. Ltd...Respondent.Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.Ms. Vasanti B. Patel for the Respondent.CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATE : 1st April, 2009.PC :1. This is a notice of motion for condoning 432 daysdelay in filing the main appeal. 2. Perusal of the affidavit in support indicates thatthough the approval for filing the appeal was grantedon 13.4.2007 and thereafter matter was sent to thepanel counsel for drafting the appeal memo. Theappeal was filed on 23.6.2008. The delay for one yearand two months caused between 13.4.2007 and 23.6.2008has not been properly explained.3. In our view, therefore, the cause shown does notamount to sufficient cause and hence, notice of motionis dismissed. Consequently, appeal is also dismissed. ( R.S. MOHITE, J.)( F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan