Case Law › High Court › Nma/1068/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/1068/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 8 Mumbai v. M/S. Radhavallaabh Silk Mills Pvt Ltd

High Court 01 Apr 2009 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

01 Apr 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/1068/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 8 Mumbai v. M/S. Radhavallaabh Silk Mills Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1068 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.2809 OF 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax-8...Appellant.Vs.M/s. Radhavallabh Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd...Respondent.Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.Mr. S.G.Dalal for the Respondent.CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATE : 1st April, 2009.PC : 1. This is a notice of motion for condoning 817 daysdelay in filing the main appeal. ( R.S. MOHITE, J.) ( F.I.REBELLO, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.