Nma/1068/2012 Of Rare Rose Premises P.ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 7(2)(1), Mumbai
High Court
25 Jun 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1068/2012 Of Rare Rose Premises P.ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 7(2)(1), Mumbai
Date of order
25 Jun 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/1068/2012 Of Rare Rose Premises P.ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 7(2)(1), Mumbai, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
vai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1068 OF 2012
ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LODGING) NO.653 OF 2012
Rare Rose Premises Pvt. Ltd.V/s.Income Tax Officer, Ward 7(2)(1), Mumbai
....Appellant
....Respondent
Ms.A. Vissanji with Mr.S.J. Mehta i/b M/s.S.J. Mehta & Ms.A. Vissanji for the Appellant.
Mr.D.K. Kamwat for the Respondent.
CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR AND
M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : 25TH JUNE, 2012.
P.C. :-
1.For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support, the notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer (A).
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
(S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue