Nma/1070/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 8 Mumbai v. M/S. Transasia Biomedicals Ltd
High Court
01 Apr 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1070/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 8 Mumbai v. M/S. Transasia Biomedicals Ltd
Date of order
01 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/1070/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 8 Mumbai v. M/S. Transasia Biomedicals Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Consequently, appeal is also dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1070 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.2270 OF 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax-8...Appellant.Vs.M/s. Transasia Biomedicals Ltd...Respondent.Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.Mr.S.S.Shetty for the Respondent.CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATE : 1st April, 2009.PC :
1. This is a notice of motion for condoning 788 days
delay in filing the main appeal.
2. Perusal of the affidavit in support indicates thatthe file was sent to the panel counsel for draftingthe appeal memo on 29.5.2006 but the draft wasreceived some time after 10.7.2008. The appeal wasthereafter filed on 28.7.2008. A period of more thantwo years and two months taken for drafting the appeal
memo cannot be said to be reasonable.
3. In our view, therefore, the cause shown does notamount to sufficient cause and hence, notice of motionis dismissed. Consequently, appeal is also dismissed.
( R.S. MOHITE, J.)
( F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue