Nma/1073/2008 Of The Commissioer Of Income-Tax-10,Mum v. M/S Tata Telecome Ltd
High Court
28 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1073/2008 Of The Commissioer Of Income-Tax-10,Mum v. M/S Tata Telecome Ltd
Date of order
28 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/1073/2008 Of The Commissioer Of Income-Tax-10,Mum v. M/S Tata Telecome Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1074 OF 2008inINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.619 OF 2007The Commissioner of Income TaxCity VI..Appellant
M/s Grasim Industries..Respondent
Mr.A.D.Kango for AppellantMr.A.K.Jasani i.b Mr.J.D.Mistry for Kanga & Co forRespondent
1. By this Notice of motion, the appellant isseeking condonation of 183 days delay caused infiling the appeal. For the reasons stated in theaffidavit in support of the notice of motion,sufficient cause is made out for condonation ofdelay and there is no case of inaction, negligenceor want of bonafide on the part of the appellant.Hence, the notice of motion is made absolute interms of prayer clause (a).
2. Place the appeal on board for admission in themonth of September, 2008 subject to numbering.
(A.V.Nirgude, J)(Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue