Nma/1086/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City-I, Mumbai v. M/S. Nilkamal Plastics Ltd
High Court
01 Oct 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1086/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City-I, Mumbai v. M/S. Nilkamal Plastics Ltd
Date of order
01 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/1086/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City-I, Mumbai v. M/S. Nilkamal Plastics Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1086 OF 2006WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.379 OF 2006
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1086 OF 2006
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.379 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
Nilkamal Plastics Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.A.S. Rao for appellant.
Mr.Sameer G. Dalal for respondent.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 1ST OCTOBER, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
There is a delay of 487 days in preferring
the appeal. There is an affidavit filed by V.A.Shinde
in support of the Motion. The I.T.A.T. order was
received on 13/7/2004. The C.I.T. approval was
received on 8/11/2004. The file was handed over to
Panel Counsel on 9/11/2004. The draft memo of appeal
was received on 1/12/2005 and the appeal was filed on
10/3/2006. There is is no explanation whatsoever for
the delay between 9/11/2004 to 1/12/2005. Considering
the cause shown, in our opinion, the same would not
amount to sufficient cause. Hence Motion is dismissed.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.