Case LawHigh Court › Nma/1086/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/1086/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City-I, Mumbai v. M/S. Nilkamal Plastics Ltd

High Court 01 Oct 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1086/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City-I, Mumbai v. M/S. Nilkamal Plastics Ltd
Date of order
01 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/1086/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City-I, Mumbai v. M/S. Nilkamal Plastics Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1086 OF 2006WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.379 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1086 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.379 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. Nilkamal Plastics Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.A.S. Rao for appellant. Mr.Sameer G. Dalal for respondent. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 1ST OCTOBER, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- There is a delay of 487 days in preferring the appeal. There is an affidavit filed by V.A.Shinde in support of the Motion. The I.T.A.T. order was received on 13/7/2004. The C.I.T. approval was received on 8/11/2004. The file was handed over to Panel Counsel on 9/11/2004. The draft memo of appeal was received on 1/12/2005 and the appeal was filed on 10/3/2006. There is is no explanation whatsoever for the delay between 9/11/2004 to 1/12/2005. Considering the cause shown, in our opinion, the same would not amount to sufficient cause. Hence Motion is dismissed. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan