Nma/110/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -13 v. Nihar Equipment Pvt. Ltd
High Court
23 Feb 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/110/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -13 v. Nihar Equipment Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
23 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
2011-12
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nma/110/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -13 v. Nihar Equipment Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 4.Needless to state that if the office objections are not removed within four weeks from today, the appeal itself would stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 110 of 2018
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2724 OF 2017
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-13,Mumbai .. Applicant
In the matter betweenPrincipal Commissioner of Income Tax-13,Mumbai .. Appellant
v/s.
Nihar Equipment Pvt. Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma for the applicant / orig. appellant None for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J.J.
DATED : 23[rd] FEBRUARY, 2018.
P.C.
1.This motion seeks condonation of 1 day delay in filing the appeal
against the order dated 29[th] March, 2017 passed by the Income tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal) for Assessment Year 2011-12.
2.
We have perused the affidavit dated 12[th] December, 2017 in
support of the motion of Anu Radha S., Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and are satisfied with the reasons stated therein.
3.Accordingly, the motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
4.Needless to state that if the office objections are not removed within four weeks from today, the appeal itself would stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.
(RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue