Nma/1107/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-19, Mumbai v. Fakhruddin N. Mansuri
High Court
01 Oct 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1107/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-19, Mumbai v. Fakhruddin N. Mansuri
Date of order
01 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/1107/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-19, Mumbai v. Fakhruddin N. Mansuri, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Motion and appeal are dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1107 OF 2006 WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.464 OF 2006
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1107 OF 2006
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.464 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
Mr. Fakruddin N. Mansuri ..Respondent.
Mr.R.K. Sharma for appellant.
Ms Aasifa Khan for respondent.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 1ST OCTOBER, 2007.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 1ST OCTOBER, 2007.
P.C. :-
As the tax incidence is less than Rs.4
lakhs, learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave to
withdraw the Motion and the appeal. Motion and appeal
are dismissed as withdrawn. The question of law, if
any, is left open for consideration in an appropriate
case. Refund of Court fees as per rules. Certified
copy expedited.
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue