Nma/1113/2018 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Mumbai v. Quantum Advisors Pvt. Ltd
High Court
25 Jan 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1113/2018 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Mumbai v. Quantum Advisors Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
25 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nma/1113/2018 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Mumbai v. Quantum Advisors Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The delay in moving thismotion is condoned and the order dated 6[th] July, 2017 is quashed and set aside.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1113 OF 2018ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 748 OF 2017
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1.. ApplicantIn the matter betweenThe Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1.. Appellant v/s.
M/s. Quantum Advisors (P) Ltd.
.. Respondent
Mr. P.C. Chhotaray for the applicant / appellant Mr. Atul Jasani for the respondent
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI &
M.S. SANKLECHA, J.J.
P.C.
DATED : 25[th] JANUARY, 2019
1.This application seeks condonation of 391 days delay in takingout this motion to set aside the order dated 6[th] July, 2017 passed by theProthonotary and Senior Master under Rule 986 of the Bombay HighCourt (Original Side) Rules for non-removal of office objections.
2.We have perused the affidavit in support of the motion and aresatisfied with the reasons indicated therein. In the peculiar facts of the
present case, the notice of motion is allowed. The delay in moving thismotion is condoned and the order dated 6[th] July, 2017 is quashed and
set aside.
3.Needless to state that if the office objections are not removedwithin a period of four weeks from today, the appeal shall standdismissed without further reference to the Court.
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
(AKIL KURESHI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue