Nma/1134/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-I, Mumbai v. M/S. Wochardt Life Sciences Ltd
High Court
14 Nov 2006 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1134/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-I, Mumbai v. M/S. Wochardt Life Sciences Ltd
Date of order
14 Nov 2006
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/1134/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-I, Mumbai v. M/S. Wochardt Life Sciences Ltd, the High Court (2006) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1134 OF 2004INNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1321 OF 2003 IN ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.369 OF 2003
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1134 OF 2004
IN
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1321 OF 2003 IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.369 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Wockhardt Life Sciences Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.B.M.Chatterjee for appellant.
Mr.S.J.Mehta with P.C.Tripathi and Dinesh Vyas for
respondent.
CORAM : H.L.GOKHALE AND
CORAM : H.L.GOKHALE AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 14TH NOVEMBER, 2006.
DATED : 14TH NOVEMBER, 2006.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
Heard Mr.Chatterjee in suport of the motion.
Mr.Mehta appears for respondent. Motion seeks
restoration of appeal which was dismissed for not
filing detailed affidavit. Now the affidavit is filed.
We grant this motion and appeal is restored and it be
numbered.
Appeal is listed for admission on
27/11/2006.
(H.L.GOKHALE, J.)
(H.L.GOKHALE, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.