Case LawHigh Court › Nma/1134/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Nma/1134/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-I, Mumbai v. M/S. Wochardt Life Sciences Ltd

High Court 14 Nov 2006 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1134/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-I, Mumbai v. M/S. Wochardt Life Sciences Ltd
Date of order
14 Nov 2006
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/1134/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-I, Mumbai v. M/S. Wochardt Life Sciences Ltd, the High Court (2006) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1134 OF 2004INNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1321 OF 2003 IN ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.369 OF 2003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1134 OF 2004 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1321 OF 2003 IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.369 OF 2003 The Commissioner of Income tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Wockhardt Life Sciences Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.B.M.Chatterjee for appellant. Mr.S.J.Mehta with P.C.Tripathi and Dinesh Vyas for respondent. CORAM : H.L.GOKHALE AND CORAM : H.L.GOKHALE AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 14TH NOVEMBER, 2006. DATED : 14TH NOVEMBER, 2006. P.C. :- P.C. :- Heard Mr.Chatterjee in suport of the motion. Mr.Mehta appears for respondent. Motion seeks restoration of appeal which was dismissed for not filing detailed affidavit. Now the affidavit is filed. We grant this motion and appeal is restored and it be numbered. Appeal is listed for admission on 27/11/2006. (H.L.GOKHALE, J.) (H.L.GOKHALE, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan