Case LawHigh Court › Nma/1138/2005 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Nma/1138/2005 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax -7 v. Boehringer Mannheim India Ltd

High Court 16 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1138/2005 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax -7 v. Boehringer Mannheim India Ltd
Date of order
16 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Nma/1138/2005 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax -7 v. Boehringer Mannheim India Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1138 OF 2005 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1138 OF 2005 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.485 OF 2005 INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.485 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Boehringer Mannheim India Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. None for respondent. CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 16TH APRIL, 2008. DATED : 16TH APRIL, 2008. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. None for the respondent, though served. Affidavit of service is filed. Perused the affidavit filed in support of the Notice of Motion. The Motion is filed for condonation of 38 days delay in filing the above appeal. Sufficient cause is shown for condoning the delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the appellant. Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Appeal be numbered. 2. Appeal be listed for hearing in July, 2008 subject to numbering. 3. Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan