Case Law › High Court › Nma/1149/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/1149/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Vi,Mum v. M/S E. Merck (Indaia) Ltd

High Court 22 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

22 Jan 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/1149/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Vi,Mum v. M/S E. Merck (Indaia) Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: As the motion for condonation of delay is dismissed,appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

reasonable. In the circumstances, cause shown is not sufficient cause and therefore, appeal is dismissed. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.587 OF 2006The Commissioner of Income tax-VI...Appellant.Vs.M/s. E-Merck (India) Ltd...Respondent.Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.Mr.S.G.Dalal for the Respondent.CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 22ND JANUARY,2008.PC : 1. As the motion for condonation of delay is dismissed,appeal is dismissed. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.