Nma/1160/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-3 v. Krishna Lifestyle Technologies Ltd
High Court
09 Aug 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1160/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-3 v. Krishna Lifestyle Technologies Ltd
Date of order
09 Aug 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/1160/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-3 v. Krishna Lifestyle Technologies Ltd, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1160 OF 2017
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1405 OF 2016
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-3
… Applicant
V/s.
M/s. Krishna Lifestyle Technologies Ltd.
… Respondent
-----
Ms. Padma Divakar for the Applicant/AppellantNone for the Respondent.
P.C.:
CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI &
SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, JJ.DATE : 09th AUGUST, 2017
.None appears for the Respondent, though duly served.
2Having heard Ms. Divakar appearing for the Applicant in support and perusing the Affidavit of Aditi Goel, the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai, we are satisfied that sufficient cause is made out for condoning the
delay.
3The motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
4Four weeks time is granted to remove all office objections.
(SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.)
(S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue