Nma/1161/2003 Of The Cosmmissioner Of Income Atax,City-Vii, Mumbai v. Redifussion Advertisig P. Ltd
High Court
16 Oct 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1161/2003 Of The Cosmmissioner Of Income Atax,City-Vii, Mumbai v. Redifussion Advertisig P. Ltd
Date of order
16 Oct 2006
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/1161/2003 Of The Cosmmissioner Of Income Atax,City-Vii, Mumbai v. Redifussion Advertisig P. Ltd, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
Notice of Motion No.1161 of 2003
In
Income Tax Appeal (L) No.323 of 2003
The Commissioner of Income-tax. .. Appellant
v/s.
M/s.Rediffusion Advertising
pvt.Not.(Now known as M/s.Rediffusion
Holdings Pvt.Ltd.). .. .. Respondent
Mr.Shiv Motaria for appellant.
Mr.B.D.Damodhar i/by Kanga & Co. for respondent.
-----
CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 16th October 2006
DATED : 16th October 2006
P.C. :
P.C. :
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.
2. Motion seeks condonation of delay of 151
days in filing the above Appeal. The reasons are
given in the supporting affidavit which include
the various dates on which necessary steps are
taken. We accept the explanation given in the
supporting affidavit. Delay Condoned. Motion
granted in terms of prayer (a).
3. Appeal be numbered and be listed for
admission on 13th November 2006.
4. Motion disposed of.
(H.L. GOKHALE, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue