Nma/1167/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, City-Xix, Mumbai v. M/S. A And P Developers
High Court
05 Jun 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1167/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, City-Xix, Mumbai v. M/S. A And P Developers
Date of order
05 Jun 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nma/1167/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, City-Xix, Mumbai v. M/S. A And P Developers, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1167 OF 2004INNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3597 OF 2003ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.1171 of 2003The Commissioner of Income Tax.. ApplicantMumbai XIXvsM/s A & P Developers ..RespondentsMr.R.G.Bhat for ApplicantMr.Y.R.Dubey for RespondentsCORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJDATE : 5th June, 2007P.C.1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant.Learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave towithdraw the appeal as the tax liability involvedin the above is less than Rs.4,00,000/-. Theappeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed assuch.2. Permissible court fees be refunded to theapplicant as per rules. However, questionsraised in the above appeal arekept open.(V.C.Daga, J)(Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue