Nma/1179/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-26, Mumbai v. Mr. Keith Sheldon
High Court
30 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1179/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-26, Mumbai v. Mr. Keith Sheldon
Date of order
30 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/1179/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-26, Mumbai v. Mr. Keith Sheldon, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1179/2007 IN ITXA (L) NO.336/2007
(The CIT Mumbai V/s.Mr.Keith Sheldon)
____________________________________________________________________
Office Notes, Office Memo- ¦
-randa of Coram, Apperances¦ Court’s or Judges Orders
Courts orders or directions¦
and Prothonotary’s orders ¦
--------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
A.V.NIRGUDE, JJ.
A.V.NIRGUDE, JJ.
30th April, 2008
: DATE30th April, 2008
: DATE
: DATE
P.C.:
P.C.:
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned Counsel
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. None
appears for the Respondent though served.
By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is
seeking condonation of 161 days’ delay
caused in filing the Appeal. For the
reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support
of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is
made out for condonation of delay, and there
is no case of inaction, negligence or want
of bonafide on the part of the Appellant.
Hence, Notice of Motion is made absolute in
terms of prayer clause (a).
2. Place the Appeal on board for admission
in the month of October-2008, subject to
numbering.
(A.V.NIRGUDE, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(A.V.NIRGUDE, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.