Nma/121/2005 Of Rakesh Ramani v. Income Tax Officer War 14(1)-4 Mumbai And Ors
High Court
11 Feb 2005 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/121/2005 Of Rakesh Ramani v. Income Tax Officer War 14(1)-4 Mumbai And Ors
Date of order
11 Feb 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/121/2005 Of Rakesh Ramani v. Income Tax Officer War 14(1)-4 Mumbai And Ors, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 121 OF 2005
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 455 OF 2003
Rakesh Ramani .. Appellant
V/s.
Income Tax Officer, Ward 14(1)-4,
Mumbai & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Pramod Kumar Parida for Appellant in support of
the Notice of Motion
Mr. R.V. Desai for the Respondents
CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 11.02.2005
DATED : 11.02.2005
DATED : 11.02.2005
P.C.:-
P.C.:-
1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant and the
learned counsel for the Respondents. By this Notice of
Motion, the Appellant is seeking recall of our order
dated 18.10.2004, whereby the above Appeal was dismissed
in default. Perused the Affidavit in support of the
Notice of Motion. For the reasons stated therein,
sufficient cause is made out. There is no case of
inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of
the Appellant, hence the Notice of Motion is made
absolute in terms of prayer clause (A). Place the Appeal
on Board for admission on 21.2.2005.
(S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.