Case LawHigh Court › Nma/1219/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/1219/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- City-3 Mumbai v. M/S. Virgo Impex P Ltd

High Court 21 Apr 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1219/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- City-3 Mumbai v. M/S. Virgo Impex P Ltd
Date of order
21 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/1219/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- City-3 Mumbai v. M/S. Virgo Impex P Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Both the Notice of Motion and the appeal are disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1219 OF 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1219 OF 2009 WITH WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1662 OF 2008 INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1662 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Virgo Impex P. Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. None for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 21ST APRIL, 2009. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 21ST APRIL, 2009. P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. The Revenue has filed this appeal which is delayed by 90 days. Though the Notice of Motion has not been served on the respondent, learned counsel appearing for the revenue submits that the issue raise in this appeal is covered by the Judgment of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Walfort Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. WalfortShare and Stock Brokers P.Ltd. reported in [2009] 310I.T.R. 421. In this view of this view of the matter Share and Stock Brokers P.Ltd. I.T.R. 421 without issuing notice to the respondent, we condone the delay in filing the appeal. Notice of Motion made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). - = : 2 : = - 2. However, we make it clear that in the event the respondent / assessee is aggrieved by this order, it would be open to the respondent / assessee to apply for the review of the order condoning the delay. 3. Since the issue sought to be raised in this appeal is covered, the appeal is dismissed in limini for the reasons stated in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Walfort Share and Stock Brokers P.Ltd. reported in [2009] 310 I.T.R. 421. 4. Both the Notice of Motion and the appeal are disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan