Nma/1219/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- City-3 Mumbai v. M/S. Virgo Impex P Ltd
High Court
21 Apr 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1219/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- City-3 Mumbai v. M/S. Virgo Impex P Ltd
Date of order
21 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/1219/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- City-3 Mumbai v. M/S. Virgo Impex P Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Both the Notice of Motion and the appeal are disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1219 OF 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1219 OF 2009
WITH
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1662 OF 2008
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1662 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Virgo Impex P. Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 21ST APRIL, 2009.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 21ST APRIL, 2009.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
1. The Revenue has filed this appeal which is
delayed by 90 days. Though the Notice of Motion has
not been served on the respondent, learned counsel
appearing for the revenue submits that the issue raise
in this appeal is covered by the Judgment of this Court
in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Walfort
Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. WalfortShare and Stock Brokers P.Ltd. reported in [2009] 310I.T.R. 421. In this view of this view of the matter
Share and Stock Brokers P.Ltd.
I.T.R. 421
without issuing notice to the respondent, we condone
the delay in filing the appeal. Notice of Motion made
absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
- = : 2 : = -
2. However, we make it clear that in the event
the respondent / assessee is aggrieved by this order,
it would be open to the respondent / assessee to apply
for the review of the order condoning the delay.
3. Since the issue sought to be raised in this
appeal is covered, the appeal is dismissed in limini
for the reasons stated in the case of Commissioner of
Income Tax V/s. Walfort Share and Stock Brokers P.Ltd. reported in [2009] 310 I.T.R. 421.
4. Both the Notice of Motion and the appeal are
disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.