Nma/1222/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Pune v. Manoj H. Khinvasara (Huf), Pune
High Court
10 Aug 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1222/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Pune v. Manoj H. Khinvasara (Huf), Pune
Date of order
10 Aug 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nma/1222/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Pune v. Manoj H. Khinvasara (Huf), Pune, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1222 OF 2011ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.870 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-, Mumbai
..Appellant.
V/s.Manoj H. Khinvasara (HUF)
..Respondent.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant.
None for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND
A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATED : 10TH AUGUST, 2011
P.C. :-
In view of the order passed by the Apex Court on 6/7/2011 in the S.L.P. filed against the order passed in the above appeal by this Court on 23/7/2009, counsel for the revenue seeks leave to withdraw the Notice of Motion. Notice of Motion is allowed to be withdrawn with no order as to costs.
(A.A. SAYED, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue