Nma/1237/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-I, Mumbai v. M/S Carol Info Services Ltd
High Court
05 Jun 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1237/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-I, Mumbai v. M/S Carol Info Services Ltd
Date of order
05 Jun 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/1237/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-I, Mumbai v. M/S Carol Info Services Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1237 of 2004ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.424 of 2004The Commissioner of Income taxCentral I, Mumbai.. AppellantvsM/s Carol Info Services Ltd .. RespondentMr.A.Kotangale,Sr.Adv. i/bMr.PankajKapoor for Appellant in support of NMNone for RespondentCORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJDATE : 5th June, 2007P.C.1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. Noneappeared for the respondent though served. Perusedthe Notice of motion and the affidavit in supportthereof. For the reasons stated therein,sufficient cause is made out for condoning thedelayin filing the above appeal. There is no caseof inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on thepart of the applicant.2. Notice of motion is made absolute in terms ofprayer clause (a).(V.C.Daga, J)(Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue