Nma/1275/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax ( Central ) Pune v. Omprakash Bajranglal Agarwal

sbw *1* 2to5.nma1275,1276,1327& 1331.13 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1275 OF 2013ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.105 OF 2011WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1276 OF 2013ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.106 OF 2011WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1327 OF 2013IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.108 OF 2011 WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1331 OF 2013ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.107 OF 2011 The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) ..Appellant -Versus-Omprakash Bajranglal Agarwal ..Respondent ........... Mr. Vimal Gupta, Senior Counsel, with Ms. Padma Divakar for the Appellant.None for the Respondent. ........... CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARIAND B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ. DATE :- 8[th] August, 2014 P.C.: 1]We have heard Mr. Vimal Gupta, learned Senior Counsel, appearing in support of these applications which are for restoration of the appeals. *2* 2to5.nma1275,1276,1327& 1331.13 The appeals were dismissed on account of the failure of the appellant-revenue to comply with the office objections and rather remove them. For the reasons set out in the affidavit in support and finding that none appears for the respondent though duly served the conditional orders are set aside and the Notices of Motion are made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b). Since the respondent is absent, there would be no orders as to costs. 2]List these Appeals for admission after four weeks. In the meanwhile, the appeals filed by the revenue and copies of the memos and annexures thereof be served on the respondent-assessee. The proof of such service shall be filed within this stipulated period. If this order is not abided, each of these appeals shall stand dismissed without any further reference to this Court. (B.P.COLABAWALLA, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) wadhwa