In Nma/1289/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-10 Mumbai v. Godrej Soaps Ltd, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1289 OF 2009 IN
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1289 OF 2009
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1537 OF 2008
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1537 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Godrej Soaps Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.J.S.Saluja for appellant.
Mr.Jitendra Jain with Atul Jasani for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 23RD APRIL, 2009.
P.C. :-
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and
learned counsel for the respondent. Perused the
affidavit filed in support of the Notice of Motion.
The delay is one one day. For the reasons stated in
the affidavit, Notice of Motion is made absolute in
terms of prayer clause (a). Office to register the
appeal.
2. Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly
with no order as to costs.
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.