Nma/1295/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-2,Mum v. M/S Tata Sons Ltd
High Court
29 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1295/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-2,Mum v. M/S Tata Sons Ltd
Date of order
29 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/1295/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-2,Mum v. M/S Tata Sons Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORIDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1295 OF 2008
ININCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.874 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai
...Appellant
V/s.
M/s.Tata Sons Ltd.
...Respondent
Mr.P.P. Bhosale with Mr.B.M. Chatterji with Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for Appellant.Mr.P.C. Tripathi with Mr.Dinesh Vyas for Respondent.
CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & A.V. NIRGUDE, JJ.
DATED : 29[th] APRIL, 2008.
P.C.:-
1.Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel forrespondent. By this Notice of Motion, appellant is seeking condonation of117 days delay in filing appeal. Perused the affidavit filed in support of Noticeof Motion. Sufficient cause is shown for condoning the delay. There is nocase of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the appellant.
Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause(a). Appeal benumbered.
2.Learned counsel for the appellant undertakes to serve copy ofmemo of appeal within a period of one week from today. Appeal be listed forhearing in the month of October, 2008 subject to numbering.
3.Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly with no order as tocosts.
(DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(A.V. NIRGUDE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.